Gates draws curtain on Afghanistan

by Hugh White - 7 March 2011 8:32AM

A minor point on US Defense Secretary Robert Gates' recent West Point speech (a more thorough treatment of that speech to follow): talking about the need to break up the concrete of the Army’s promotion process, Gates started a sentence with this subordinate clause: 

After the major Afghan troop deployments end in 2014...

Just as bald as that. No 'if', 'but' or 'maybe'. No reluctance to set a date, no talk of 'conditions–based' rather then 'time-based' schedules. As far as Gates is concerned, America's major military effort in Afghanistan will end three years from now, no matter what. 

Why doesn't the Australian Government simply use the same formulation? Surely not because we expect to stay after the US goes? Someone might ask Gillard while she's in Washington.

Image by Flickr user The Rocketeer.

Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature examining the themes of the Gillard Government’s ‘Australia in the Asian Century’ White Paper. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Email Digest  

To receive a weekly digest of ‘Australia in the Asian Century’ posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.